June 9, 2013
"If you want to make a human being into a monster, deny them, at the cultural level, any reflection of themselves. And growing up, I felt like a monster in some ways. I didn’t see myself reflected at all. I was like, “Yo, is something wrong with me? That the whole society seems to think that people like me don’t exist? And part of what inspired me, was this deep desire that before I died, I would make a couple of mirrors. That I would make some mirrors so that kids like me might seem themselves reflected back and might not feel so monstrous for it."

Junot Diaz on storytelling and representation 

June 4, 2013

Looking forward to seeing the upcoming Destination Planet Negro  - sci-fi ridiculousness from Kevin Willmott. (Because who doesn’t want to see George Washington Carver build a rocket ship to Mars?)

May 28, 2013
Letters from Blocked Filmmakers: Zoje Stage | Filmmaker Magazine

May 20, 2013
Vulture discussing the possibility of having three black Best Actor nominees at next year’s Oscars. (Personally rooting for Fruitvale Station to get as many directing and acting accolades possible - it deserves them.) 

Vulture discussing the possibility of having three black Best Actor nominees at next year’s Oscars. (Personally rooting for Fruitvale Station to get as many directing and acting accolades possible - it deserves them.) 

May 15, 2013
"Of the 4,475 speaking characters in 2012 movies, only 28.4% were women — and only 16.7% of female directors, writers, and producers were among the top-grossing 100 films of the year."

We have a long way to go.

May 10, 2013

Made me laugh. (via Ava DuVernay)

May 6, 2013
A good point from Ted Hope 
“The film industry has not found a way to match audiences with the content they will most likely to respond to.  It doesn’t even look like this is a priority for the business.  Everything is spaghetti against the wall, marketed in the same way & only to the most general demographics of race, gender, & income. In order to reach the people who might respond to a film, the film industry remains dependent on telling everyone (including those who could care less) about each new film.  It is a poorly allocated dedication of resources.  We spend more money telling those who will never be interested, than focusing on those who have already demonstrated support.  There is no audience aggregation platform exclusively for those who love movies, no place where all people who love movies engage deeply about films – if there was, marketing costs could shrink.”

A good point from Ted Hope 

“The film industry has not found a way to match audiences with the content they will most likely to respond to.  It doesn’t even look like this is a priority for the business.  Everything is spaghetti against the wall, marketed in the same way & only to the most general demographics of race, gender, & income. In order to reach the people who might respond to a film, the film industry remains dependent on telling everyone (including those who could care less) about each new film.  It is a poorly allocated dedication of resources.  We spend more money telling those who will never be interested, than focusing on those who have already demonstrated support.  There is no audience aggregation platform exclusively for those who love movies, no place where all people who love movies engage deeply about films – if there was, marketing costs could shrink.”

April 29, 2013
My article on Issa Rae and her major career rise is in the Spring 2013 print edition of Filmmaker Magazine, on stands now. 

My article on Issa Rae and her major career rise is in the Spring 2013 print edition of Filmmaker Magazine, on stands now. 

April 29, 2013
"Foreign pre-sales estimates remain one of the currencies by which independent film projects are cash-flowed, and yet overseas markets put inordinate stock on yesterday’s box office stars. Foreign distributors are said to be 12-18 months behind the domestic marketplace in terms of who they think is exciting audiences."

— So true. (via Indiewire)

April 14, 2013
"Today we live or die on a model that is completely dependent upon the amount of screens a film plays on. Common wisdom is that the more screens your movie is playing on, the more money you’re making. But for most films, this is a complete fallacy in which demand is not meeting supply and costs are exceeding revenue. And because of this, for far too many good movies, the theatrical window has become nothing more than a loss leader. But it does’t have to be this way. As bands have learned long ago, the key to making money is to make things feel exclusive and special, and then work to get the “average spend per customer” higher."

Some interesting remarks from Marc Schiller on treating the indie filmmaking business “like a rockstar” would. But as long as major media outlets only review movies that have traditional theatrical releases, we’re never going to move past the “middleman” hump. Without a P&A budget or a major review, the majority of people will not find the work you’re trying to sell. But I couldn’t agree more that theatrical box office numbers will mean little down the road. Part of me thinks, though, that instead of making the theater experience even more limited and precious-feeling, theaters should move into a subscription model, so people see content more freely and filmmakers don’t feel beholden to technical gimmicks or the need to pander to certain genres. 

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »